The Grand Deception

THE GRAND DECEPTION AS TOLD BY A CHEVY CAMARO (trespass upon our property and living estate)
by the living man, kenneth-william of the House Dost

This story has to do with intentionally concealed MERS®, that is to say the MERS United States Registered Trademark and the underlying MERS/Nationsbank Credit Security Agreement, which is a material alteration and modification of the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument that jumps out of the 4 corners and into a world of demonic evil that sets out to destroy all living men, women, and children who were lured into its clutches

Imagine one day you went out and purchased a brand new Chevy Camaro. You did not purchase it to drive it but rather to park it for next 10-15 years for future investment reasons. So you drive it straight from the dealer to a storage warehouse – put a cover over the vehicle, lock the pulldown door and completely walk away, forgetting about the car for the next 10 or so years.
The years roll by until the day arrives you decide to crack open the door and drive out what is now a classic high sought after vehicle, that for all intents and purposes is a brand spanking new vehicle from the year 2015. So, you roll up the door and to your shock and horror your classic vehicle is filthy dirty….Not only are there dents on the hood, the bumper, and rear driver side quarter panel, the interior is worn, the engine is filthy and the odometer has a registered 182,569 miles…..
Furious, you come to find out that the manager that oversaw the storage facility the first 9 years your car was in storage had been renting out your vehicle for fees of which he pocketed…..Of course, that manager is no longer employed at the storage facility.
Liken this analogy to at least over 67 million mortgage loans to real property agreements; liken this to your own mortgage loan. While you believed you had ownership, others were leasing out the use of your collateral time and time and time again – earning fees, compensation, and bonuses by stealing the use of your collateral for which you received not a single nickel……..As a worse slap in the face, after making millions upon millions off your collateral, these criminal banksters, brokers, and insurance agents default you, defame and assassinate your character, destroy your credit, your livelihood, leaving you penniless in endless debt and millions upon millions: homeless.
When a mortgage borrower puts pen to paper and signs the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument, that is to say, the mortgage loan agreement, the assumption is there is an approval for a mortgage loan, from a lender to purchase real property. The greater assumption is one steeped in paradigm and one of pride, achieving the ‘American Dream’ to which they can now call themselves a homeowner.
The 21st century reality however is the paradigm is dead; a mortgage to real property is nothing more than a legal fiction, a ‘pretend’ mortgage to real property. This was by the banksters along with the government’s intent and design, to make us believe in something that no longer exists. For what purpose, you say? The theft of all ownership of course, not just of the real property collateral, but all property, personal and intellectual, currently owned or that ever will be owned.
Our perception is the mortgage (Deed of Trust/Note) is immediately sold to an investment bank who aggregate the mortgage into a pool with other mortgages, establishing an SPE into which the pool is transferred and from which certificates are issued and sold to investors. —–True? Not entirely
The fact of the matter is that the originator/pretend lender does not actually sell anything, rather merely pledges the alleged loan, in other words, the alleged mortgage loan is ‘held for sale’….It is ONLY upon default that the alleged mortgage loan’s “first sale” actually occurs…Stated another manner, the Assignment of Deed of Trust is the first sale – that is too say the putting back together of title and note, which though in fact was never together to begin with because the ‘option’ to purchase the defaulted loan was sold before a borrower ever signed the documents.
The option holder (broker) has control of the note and may and does sell it time and time again…..Imagine making 1000 copies of the executed note, putting them in a box and shipping it off to Borders Bookstore. The box is unpacked, labeled with a price tag and put on the shelves for sale – no different from a copyrighted work…except in this case the mortgage is a derivative and the broker is the holder of that copyright derivative.
Ownership of copyrights can be transferred either by operation of law or by a written instrument. 17 U.S.C. § 204(a) (2000). Courts have interpreted “transfer by operation of law” to mean “transfers by bequest, bankruptcy, mortgage foreclosures, and the like.” Taylor Corp. v. Four Seasons Greetings, L.L.C., 403 F.3d 958, 963 (8th Cir. 2005) (citing Brooks v. Bodes, 230.781 F. Supp. 202, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 1991))
As a matter of law, authors and owners of copyright immediately possess the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, perform, and display copyrighted works and to prepare derivative works based on them. The Computer Software Copyright Act of 1980 amended the Copyright Act of 1976 to include “computer programs.”
The Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument is a copyrighted work of a computer program which becomes a derivative upon the borrowers signing of the agreement. The banksters are thus unjustly enriching themselves many times over, selling an alleged mortgage loan they do not even own….The broker’s future fees and compensation are realized upon default with the actual first sale, which he collects on with the liquidation of the collateral.
Stated another way:
-Derivatives were deregulated
-Derivatives are securities
-Derivatives are credit default swaps, Collateralized Bond Obligations (CBO), CMO’S, CDO’S, CDO SQ., RMBS, MBS, ABS, and whatever other financially engineered (patents and trademarks) these bankster, broker, insurance agent criminals can come up with
-The simplest form of a derivative is in the name of this page – A Copyright Derivative – which occurs when you place your signature upon the copyrighted Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument.
We the people were made reliant on false representations that the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument was ‘personal property’ thereby a negotiable instrument – UCC3
How can a copyright DERIVATIVE, a security, be both a negotiable instrument AND a security
It cannot
The common logic is rather clear – We the people were lured into executing a ‘basket of securities’ of which are STOLEN from us because the one who controls the copyright derivative controls all our ‘rights in property’
Not only have they stolen our real property collateral – they have thus stolen all our rights in property – real, personal, and intellectual which was derived our executing what we believed was a mortgage loan to real property (a negotiable instrument) but in fact and truth was a collateralized copyright.
In fact what consumers were lured into giving uninformed consent to is an installment lease to a future purchase; a presecuritized investment contract to which the consumer is the uninformed third party beneficiary, creditor, and entitlement holder.
Most notable, is a 1998 security agreement between Nationsbank (Bank of America) and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. registered under the MERS intentionally and actively concealed Trademark found in the publicly accessible databases of the United States Patents and Trademarks Office (“USTPO”).
Borrowers were intentionally misled to placed their signatures upon the Fannie/Freddie Standard Uniform Instrument –MERS with representation MERS was just a registry, which states:
¶Borrower understands and agrees that MERS’ holds only legal title to the interests granted by Borrower in this Security Instrument, but, if necessary to comply with law or custom, MERS (as nominee for Lender and Lender’s successors and assigns) has the right: to exercise any or all of those interests, including, but not limited to, the right to foreclose and sell the Property; and to take any action required of Lender including, but not limited to, releasing and canceling this Security Instrument.
Further stating,
¶Provides “MERS” is Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. MERS is a separate corporation that is acting solely as nominee for Lender and Lender’s successors and assigns. MERS is the beneficiary under this Security Instrument. MERS is organized and existing under the laws of Delaware.
¶Provides – The beneficiary of this Security Instrument is MERS (solely as nominee for Lender and Lender’s successors and assigns) and the successors and assigns of MERS’.
What borrowers were not told was they were agreeing to a licensing agreement and not a mortgage loan to real property. They were agreeing to give up all ownership to property (real, personal, and Intellectual) or more specifically agreeing to act as a “LICENSEE OF INFORMATION” under the laws of the Commonwealth of the State of Virginia per terms under an intentionally concealed security agreement between Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Nationsbank (Bank of America).
As such under Virginia law § 59.1-501.2(15) Defines a Consumer as
“[a]n individual who is a licensee of information or informational rights that the individual at the time of contracting intended to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. The term does not include an individual who is a licensee primarily for professional or commercial purposes, including agriculture, business management, and investment management other than management of the individual’s personal or family investments.”
As such under Virginia law § § 59.1-501.2 (41) (42) (43) as to licenses:
(41) “License” means a contract that authorizes access to, or use, distribution, performance, modification, or reproduction of, information or informational rights, but expressly limits the access or uses authorized or expressly grants fewer than all rights in the information, whether or not the transferee has title to a licensed copy. The term includes an access contract, a lease of a computer program, and a consignment of a copy. The term does not include a reservation or creation of a security interest to the extent the interest is governed by Title 8.9A. [8.9A is Oregon §ORS79 – Secured Transactions]
(42) “Licensee” means a person entitled by agreement to acquire or exercise rights in, or to have access to or use of, computer information under an agreement to which this chapter applies. A licensor is not a licensee with respect to rights reserved to it under the agreement.
(43) “Licensor” means a person obligated by agreement to transfer or create rights in, or to give access to or use of, computer information or informational rights in it under an agreement to which this chapter applies. Between the provider of access and a provider of the informational content to be accessed, the provider of content is the licensor. In an exchange of information or informational rights
, each party is a licensor with respect to the information, informational rights, or access it gives.

Is it not time to dispose of the deception and deceit that has ravaged the residents of this state, and the citizens of this nation? Is it not time to wake up the fact that the residents of this state, yourself include and your family, have been targets of a mass grand larceny. How much more must we suffer the illegal acts perpetrated upon us by a crooked federal government, its agencies, banksters, brokers, and the insurance sector? How much more do we endure a court system that ignores the rule of law?

6 thoughts on “The Grand Deception”

  1. Wow!!! You guys did the darn thang!!! This is awesome. As the church Pastor says, “Make it plain”. Yes your due diligence of months of hard work has paid off and will expose them for who they are…leaving no stone unturned, no place to hide. Legally using their own laws against them. This reminds me of biblical oppression- Gods promise of relief. Moses fought against injustice going up against the most powerful King, his government, and dictatorship. Through God, and Moses tenacity, he over came the afflictions of injustice, spiritual hardships, and battles; yet he stood on his beliefs and truths- and eventually lead the Hebrews out of human bondage into the promise land. His tasks wasn’t easy, wasn’t over night, but God had the master plan that no man “yet” understood. God uses people (all of you) in mysterious ways….Look at God! Wow – Peace and blessings to you all. Thank You!

    Liked by 4 people

  2. Truly amazing… I knew of all sorts of other ponzi schemes going on and have written about them but this is quite revealing though I still do not get the nuts and bolts yet .. first read.. though it is in alignment with my research on many levels.
    If I may, and it may not matter in this instance (will get to the solution next opportunity) but please know that you own the property (house, land etc.. whatever the seller was selling) by law when you signed and the seller signed the sales agreement!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! See line 2 on most Deed of Trusts and Mortgages stating that you are “lawfully seized” of the property” if you were not then it could not be put into the trust of aliened in any way (unalienable rights, cannot be liened)
    Under that contract you have an obligation to perform which is to pay the sums agreed and they are obligated to do certain things agreed to such as a new roof, fix the rotten wood, etc. but for all tenses and purposes you are the lawful owner of the property in perpetuity allodial in nature (in his own right, without any overlord (not taxable or subject to the state or anything else!!) So long as you provide payment within the agreed time period the property is yours and you being the lawful owner thereof put it in trust (only that which is in the DOT is authorized and there is no authorizing or “provision” for a “substitute trustee” nor for any trustee to bring a foreclosure!!! They are only provided with the authority to sell the property in certain manner after the entitled party perfects their claim by due process via a competent court. None of which exists!!
    I think this is extremely important to at least know and understand so that we can stop thinking that the bank owns the property until you pay off the loan!! False!!! you own it and it remains yours, there is only a lien on it subject to the parameters specified or the rights to it are in trust which has also specific parameters/provisions to gain title to it and then a separate process to be granted possession of it .. more BS and unlawful activities as those entities never make a claim not even make an appearance in the vast majority of fraudclosures. Thus the courts never had jurisdiction .. without two parties and a controversy, claim and claimant (claim to entitlement or breach of obligation which without the courts help (relief) they would be harmed in some way and the court is there to grant “relief” to the injured party). There is no claimant, no claim, no entitlement and the courts can not grant relief where none is just and proper and can not grant relief to an unknown party who has not evidence or claim of entitlement. Notice they always say one got a loan (facts not in evidence but by not rebutting that presumption you admit to it, so they say), and defaulted on the loan!
    There is not a claim “I gave a loan to Sam I Am and he has not paid me back as a-greed and if this court does not grant me this relief I will be out this much money and here is the evidence of proof of accounting as to the funds coming from me.”
    For those who do not know or can not bring their mind to wrap around the fact that they Did NOT get a Loan… Here ya go: Do you recall receiving anything of substance or value in your hand, your bank account or someone else on your behalf (seller) BEFORE you signed and delivered the Note and DOT/Mortgage??? \
    Answer: NO!! No you did not get/receive/accept/”take by transfer” anything from the agent or anyone else PRIOR to you signing and delivering valuable security instruments to them. Thus by definition you did not get a loan!!! If I give you a fifty dollar Note and you give me two 20s and a ten, did you loan me anything? No! you merely exchanged one note for other notes, there was no loan!!! (hidden truth, you are creditors and all is derived from you the grantor, makor, signor, trustor who is entitled to all that is and when you exercise your power to contract and put your signature on an instrument YOU give it power, validity, you literally manifest it into reality!! So you are the only one who can possibly be the “holder in due course”. Which is why the DOT and all payments made etc requires that your credit instrument labeled “security instrument” and misused as a “negotiable instrument” be returned to you, the maker, upon completion or satisfaction. (see DOT line 26 I think, requires the Note to be returned marked “PAID” and the property to be reconveyed. Once the/your credit instrument (security) was delivered to the agent the agent took your request for some of your credit to be converted to currency and that currency be delivered in the amounts specified in the closing doc to the parties you listed in the amounts specified. Once that was done the process was complete, done, finished. It is everything after that that is fraud. I discovered that those who never paid or paid only a few payments generally won more often then those who made payments for a long time. Counterintuitive… because by ones actions, of making payments a quasi contract is “evidenced” else you would not be making payments.. is the excuse or reason re-lied upon.
    The very first words (conditions precedent) to you signing the Note are “In Return for a Loan I have Received, I promise to pay..” So you can not be in “default” of your conditional obligation if the conditions precedent were not fulfilled and again the court can not grant relief to those in breach!!
    So now that we have revealed that this Note has conditions precedent and other conditions, “by and between” “agree and covenant” along with the requirements thereof “The Lender or anyone who takes this Note by transfer and is entitled to payments under this Note shall be called the “Note Holder”. clearly evidences that it is NOT an “unconditional promise to pay” nor is it “payable upon demand” which is the definition of “Negotiable Instrument” (see definition clearly written in UCC 3) so the courts and rest of the perpe-traitors are making false representations of “security instruments” to defraud.
    Further a “bearer instrument” must be beard by the one on lawful possession and entitled to payment (court case stating that mere possession is not sufficient to show entitlement) Not “presentment” but “bearing the instrument and “demand for payment. After all who would buy back their instrument and not receive the instrument itself properly signed etc. along with ll copies thereof being traded??
    And oh, “left blank” is not “signed in blank” no bank or other cashing entity will cash (exchange instrument for other instruments (obligations of the United States) where the “pay to the order of _____” is left blank!! So why are the courts exchanging orders which cause the sale of property in obligations of the United States for copies of instruments “so incomplete as to not be able to defraud”?? (case quote where the court stated that an instrument that is without any payee filled out is “so incomplete as to not be able to defraud”. So why is it being “cashed” or “exchanged” for an order to sell property for value in obligations of the United States and then given to the party which bears only a copy of an alleged instrument that on its face is “so incomplete as to be impossible to deceive”??? See 18 USC 471 through 474. (I actually called Secret Service (see their mission statement) and got the agent to awaken and said OMG I cant believe the judges are not catching this… then after a moment of though said “this is nationwide”.. yes I have the recording.
    At any rate, I do not know if this is helpful to this solution or not but I think it is important to know the facts or truth of this aspect of the alleged transaction and that You own the property which is being stolen by fabrications and color of contract, trust, not provided for and in contravention of the principles and purposes for which it was signed, granted by you the grantor, maker, creditor in all things, entitled party of interest, creator of and manefestor of all value due and owing first to you as one of Creators creations, created to created and endowed with certain unalienable Rights and creditors of “any Form of Government, who are entitled to the “equal protection of the laws.” Instead of the equal deprivation of rights and protection of the laws as they would have it by deception, threat, intimidation, oppression and injury in absolute violation of 18 USC 241,242 to which all creations of the state are subjects of and subject to!! Blessings.. looking forward to researching the rest of this solution!!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. I know it all but I am not a “Know it all” I actually thought I could pay it off with a promissory note. (Michael Tellinger). It was a Mers but that didn’t matter to them, sheriffs and county police.
    I am 66 yo lived by myself and a 16 yo dog and her blind 15 yo daughter dog. They were left at my front door.
    They were great dogs daughter just passed away 6 months after mother.
    Everything was set up for the bank to win. The bank bought it at the Sheriffs sale.
    They wrote me a letter giving me 2 months to move out.
    3 days after I received the letter the police and sheriff total 8 officers came to throw me out.
    They were abusive, hurt me, pushed me around.
    They said that they made a mistake on the letter I tried to get more time as it was their mistake but they wouldn’t hear of it and kept threatening to put me in jail. If I didn’t leave now.
    I am 66 yo 5foot 3 125 lbs and an introvert they scared the heck out of me.
    I tried to get a lawyer and was told that their first alliance was to the court.
    I knew the whole problem was the bank and the court.
    I am wondering with Trump locking them up if I can get my house back.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I have been studying these posts and this line of thinking for months now. I am interested in aligning with individuals and/or groups with knowledge to take things to the next level, aka, accessing TDA properly and etc.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s